After divorce, there are people who resolve the issue. At university, developments occur regarding birth within marriage, custody, and negotiation. Child custody should be appropriate for the parents. How could it not be designed that way? Because even between marriage partners, they must be protected. The bonds of siblinghood between children cannot be hindered. Let us examine an exemplary Supreme Court Decision.
2nd Law Office
Case Number: 2020/3411
Decision Number: 2020/3968
“Text of Justice”
COURT: Samsun Regional Court of Justice 4th
Legal Department TYPE OF CASE: Divorce
The reasoning for the case between the parties is ultimately based on the court’s legal classification, the selection made as mentioned above and upon the defendant’s objection, the determination and review of fault, and the reading and evaluation without review:
1- The documents in the file that were deemed incomplete in accordance with the annulment decision were combined at the court’s discretion, and since the evaluation for the selection cannot be based on the “Lack of Funds” case without finding the counter-defendant party at fault, the missing ones are accepted as missing, and the other missing ones are also accepted as missing. According to those who bring completion to life, according to those who still see it as completely at fault in the review, the hopes that remain surrounded by the repeated counter-defendant clause are of a familial nature.
2- The custody of the parties’ joint children, Ali Kemal and the father (born in 2010) and Pelin (born in 2013), is arranged personally with the mother’s permission and in a way that the children will not see. The plaintiff-counterclaimant father’s custody request was rejected by the regional court of appeal. This is designed to be personally considered during a short semester break between the child whose custody was given to the mother and the father’s younger children, among young children in the personal community, such as young children in the immediate vicinity. There is something that needs to be reviewed because it is specific to this format.
CONCLUSION:
A children’s game on a day resulting from the third game at the end of section B, a decision arising from the opportunity to choose in section (2). Until 5:00 p.m. on the first day of religious holidays, from 10:00 a.m. on the second day, from 9:00 a.m. on August 1 to 5:00 p.m. on August 15 each year, from 9:00 a.m. on the Monday of the first week of the mid-term break each year. Until 2:00 PM, until midnight, it is taken from the father and delivered at the end of the time, and the sentence belongs to the person.
With the addition of the words “every year on Mondays between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. during the second week of the mid-year vacation,” these parts of the project have been APPROVED in their REVISED form, and the subject parts have been APPROVED in the above paragraph (1), and the first court of the file has been decided unanimously. September 21, 2020 (Wednesday).