The administrative sanction for the revocation of a driver’s license is an administrative sanction regulated by the Highway Traffic Law No. 2198, which is the revocation of a driver’s license for certain periods or indefinitely if the conditions stipulated in the law occur.
One of the reasons that lead to the cancellation of a driver’s license in Law No. 2198 is driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and stimulants.f the reasons that lead to the cancellation of a driver’s in Law No. 2198 is driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and stimulants. The lene of the reasons that lead to the cancellation of a driver’s license in Law No. 2198 is driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and stimulants. legislator has made a distinction here and determined the premium level for private vehicles as 0.50 and the premium level for commercial vehicles as 0.21. The purpose of this distinction is to ensure that those who drive commercial vehicles can drive almost without alcohol, as they need to be more careful than those who drive private vehicles.
After giving general information on the subject, we will explain which authorized and authorized court those whose driver’s licenses have been revoked will apply to against the relevant sanction.
It is possible for those whose driving licenses have been revoked due to fulfilling one of the conditions specified in the law to appeal against this administrative decision. The sanction for the revocation of the driver’s license is an administrative procedure by its nature. Therefore, the action that needs to be taken is to file a lawsuit for the cancellation of the administrative action in the administrative court.t is possible for those whose driving licenses have been revoked due to fulfilling one of the conditions specified in the law to appeal against this administrative decision.
The sanction for the revocation of the driver’s license is an administrative procedure by its nature. Therefore, the action that needs to be taken is to file a lawsuit for the cancellation of the administrative action in the administrative court. However, in the process that has developed throughout history, a conflict of duties has arisen in the decisions made by the courts, and many administrative courts have rejected applications stating that they are under the jurisdiction of criminal magistrates. In the same way, the criminal magistrates rejected the applications by showing that the administrative judiciary is responsible because the action is an administrative action.
Thereupon, the matter was moved to the dispute courts.n the same way, the criminal magistrates rejected the applications by showing that the administrative judiciary is responsible because the action is an administrative action.
Thereupon, the matter was moved to the dispute courts. However, this also did not become a solution, and the dispute courts could not find a solution to the problem of duty dispute that arose in practice by making different decisions on this issue.
Upon this, the legislator amended the Law No. 2198 in 2013 and amended the Law No. 112.pon this, the legislator amended the Law No. 2198 in 2013 and amended the Law No. 112. article, “Except for the cases where the officers and traffic registration organizations listed in Article 6 of this Law are authorized, the criminal courts of peace decide on the revocUpon this, the legislator amended the Law No. 2198 in 2013 and amended the Law No. 112. article, “Except for the cases where the officers and traffic registration organizations listed in Article 6 of this Law are author