TC
Supreme
law office
ISSUE NO: 2016/16665
DECISION NO:2018/5562
DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018
COURT : Family Court
TYPE OF CASE :Divorce
A WOMAN WHO WORKS AND EARNS A STEADY INCOME DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE CHILD SUPPORT DUE TO POVERTY.
At the end of the hearing of the case between the parties, the Decrees given by the local court, the date and number of which are shown above, were appealed by the defendant male in terms of identification of defects, alimony and compensation, documents were read and discussed if deemed necessary
:
1-According to the articles in the file, since the evidence on which the decision is based, the grounds in accordance with the law and, in particular, there is no error in evidence discretion, the defendant’s appeals that fall outside the scope of the following paragraph are not appropriate.
2-From the evidence collected, it is understood that the woman works, has a regular and constant income. TMK for the benefit of women m. 175 conditions have not been formed. While it should have been decided to reject the plaintiff woman’s request for poverty support, it was not correct to decide to accept it in writing and it should have been overturned.
CONCLUSION: 2 of the above-mentioned appeal provision. in case of DETERIORATION due to the reason shown in the paragraph, the sections subject to appeal that are outside the scope of deterioration are listed above. it was unanimously decided that it should be APPROVED for the reason shown in the paragraph, that the claim advance fee should be returned to the depositor upon request, and that the way to correct the decision would be open within 15 days from the notification of this decision. 25.04.2018