17.LEGAL DEPARTMENT 2016/16133 E. , 2017/8256 K.
“text of jurisprudence”
COURT OF First Instance: Court of First Instance
At the end of the trial of the compensation case between the parties; The file was examined and considered necessary after the defendant appealed the decision on the acceptance of the case for reasons written in the Decisionm within the period of time:
decision
Plaintiff attorney, the plaintiff in the conduct of the vehicle while cruising on my own … 17.07.2013 plate plate Plate control him from behind the vehicle as a result of the collision from behind, the drive control of the vehicle accident that had occurred the damage to the plaintiff of the defendant’s vehicle in the accident …’s full of imperfect occurred as the result of the action, find the defendant …’s the one … the other defendant Ltd. Şti. by declaring that the defendant company is also responsible for the damage caused by being registered in its name, that the plaintiff has no defects, that damage has occurred to the plaintiff’s vehicle, and that a loss of value has occurred in the vehicle due to this, that the vehicle has been in service for some time, if you are receivables due to uncertainty of traffic of vehicles registered in the name of the defendants with the imposition of injunctive relief without prejudice to the rights records on the surplus 1.000,00 TL pecuniary compensation together with interest from the date of the accident to the legal process, given that the defendants jointly and severally be requested to decide on the collection, breeding petition demand with 26.10.2015 3.500,00 TL increased.
The defendants have asked for the case to be dismissed.
Court, claim, defense, according to the collected evidence and expert adopted the report of the accident as of the date of peers trading market value of undamaged 58.500,00 TL at the date of the accident repairs and vehicle trading market, the value after a number of 55.000,00 TL
with the acceptance of a given case 3.500,00 TL financial compensation together with interest from the date to the event date 17/07/2013 legal process, defendants jointly and severally to the plaintiff should be awarded with the collection, it was decided that; the judgment was appealed by the defendant.
According to the evidence collected and evaluated by the court, in particular, there is no irregularity in the calculation of the defect rate and compensation specified in the expert expert report prepared in accordance with the occurrence and file content, the defendant has rejected all appeals not seen on the spot and approved the decision in accordance with the procedure and law and received the remaining approval fee of 180.00 TL written below from the appellant defendant … 27.9.2017 it was decided unanimously on the day.
You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.