T.C.
SUPREME
11. law office
Base No:2013/7425
Decision No :2013/12152
Date of Decision: 11.06.2013
REQUEST FOR PRECAUTIONARY FORECLOSURE – PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE THAT DOES NOT EXPRESS AN EXPLANATORY OPINION
THE REASON IS THAT THE FORECLOSURE CONDITIONS ARE NOT FORMED
ACCORDING TO THE CONCEPT OF JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED FOR IN THE CONSTITUTION
IT IS INCOMPATIBLE – IT LACKS GROUNDS CONDUCIVE TO SUPERVISION
FAILURE OF THE PROVISION FACILITY IN THE FIGURE
SUMMARY: I of the request.I.K.any explanatory opinion about what conditions it does not meet
a precautionary lien that does not declare does not consist of the conditions of justification provided for in the Constitution
it cannot be said that it is incompatible with the concept of justification received. Then, by the court, it is amenable to supervision
the decision was not considered correct without justification, and the decision had to be overturned.
You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.