T.C.
Supreme
21. Criminal Department
Main Number: 2015/1191
Decision No:2015/1692
K. Historical:
21.Criminal Department 2015/1191 E. , 2015/1692 K.
“text of jurisprudence”
U the defendant’s wife.. O.. edit notes in the name and by signing it without his knowledge due to the participating firms with a request that he be punished for the crime of forgery filed in the workplace that is directed to the wife of the defendant’s actual registered, therefore, the participating firms in exchange for goods from the bowl held on behalf of his wife by pushing debt securities into shares of the business on behalf of their spouse would be signed with the signature on the voucher and participating to declare that the commercial relationship and to deny in the face of failure; making a conviction decision in writing with an erroneous assessment without considering that there is insufficient evidence for the defendant’s conviction that he acted with the consciousness of harming the participant or with the intention of committing a crime,
Contrary to the law, the accused’s appeals were considered in place as such, and for this reason, the provision is 8/1 of Law No. 5320. 321 of the CMUK No. 1412, which must be applied in accordance with Article. according to the article, it was decided unanimously on the day of 03.06.2015 to be overturned contrary to the request.
You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.