… TO THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
COMPLAINANT:
Address:
Attorney:
Address:
Suspect:
CRIME:
DATE OF CRIME: …/…/…
INSTRUCTIONS
1- The client is a businessman engaged in construction/contracting work. As the client’s contractor, the suspect, who is the property owner, and the suspect’s brother, regarding the separation of shareholders related to the construction of a new site for the real estate they own, signed a contract in the presence of a notary public at the ……. Notary Office ……. on February 2011 with …………. In accordance with their requests, they had their contracts prepared in the presence of a notary and signed them together.
2-
As required by the contract, the old building belonging to the suspect and his siblings was demolished by the client, and a new building was constructed in its place, with the apartments being delivered separately to the rightful owners. However, the suspect’s siblings are against my client due to defects in the new building and the incomplete execution of some works… The court… The creditors replaced the file with the main numbered file, and the suspect also replaced the file… At the last hearing, he was presented as a witness by our side and was summoned to the hearing. The suspect was summoned to the hearing as a witness because, although he is a brother mentioned in the file, we believe that he will not lie to the plaintiffs and will directly recount everything he witnessed.
3 – Although the suspect’s sworn statement has been suspended, the relevant parts of the case are based on his property, honor, beliefs, values, and sanctity; and despite knowing who rescued the apartment in question and how, and despite knowing certain facts and declaring that he approved them with his signature, he claims that he does not know things that did not happen or that happened contrary to what was stated.
4- The suspect stated in his witness testimony that he signed the delivery contract, inspected the building to be delivered in accordance with the procedure, and even signed this record willingly during the hearing, and despite confirming the facts with his own signature, he misled the court by making false statements in court.
LEGAL GROUNDS: 5237 PK m. 209 and related legislation.
LEGAL EVIDENCE: Witness statements and other evidence.
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY
As explained above and for the five reasons stated, we claim that this is a falsehood that partially and completely undermines the administration of justice. We state that the witness testimony is false testimony and that, despite the false statement and our persistent requests, it should not act contrary to known facts, that it will be punished by a reasoned decision as it constitutes an obstacle to a peaceful investigation, and that a decision has been made to open a public trial, which we respectfully request on behalf of my client. …/…/…
Vice President