…… …. TO THE CRIMINAL COURT
THE DECISION TO ATTACK
CONTESTED (DOUBTFUL):
TR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER :
address :
defense:
address :
SUBJECT : It consists of making an appeal against the arrest decision.
descriptions:
1-) Our client …… since the year ……. He serves as the headman; ……/…./….. In his history, a decision was made to arrest him on charges. Of aiding and abetting a terrorist organization.
However, the decision in question is 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271. It is in accordance with the article; on the other hand,. I constitutes a violation of the procedure and the law.
2-) 98 of the Law No. 5271. In the article, “An arrest warrant may be issued by a criminal judge of peace at the request of the public prosecutor for a suspect who did not come to the call or was not called during the investigation phase. In addition, if an objection is made to the rejection of the arrest request, an arrest warrant may also be issued by the objection authority. According to the regulation in the figure; The suspect must be summoned by the court before the arrest warrant is issued; an arrest warrant must be issued for the suspect who does not appear before the court despite the summons. For the reasons mentioned above, it is contrary to the procedure and the law to issue an arrest warrant against our client, who is not aware of the crime.
LEGAL REASONS: 5271 SK m. 94, 95, 96, 97, 98.
CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: On behalf of our client, we respectfully request, by proxy, that the arrest warrant issued against our client for the reasons described above be lifted and that our client’s statement be taken by instruction from the address provided to us. …/…/…
THE SUSPECT’S DEFENSE