SUPREME COURT 17. Law Office
2016/15663 E.
2017/7899 K.
Court of First Instance: Court of First Instance
At the end of the compensation case trial between the parties, the file was examined and deemed necessary upon the appeal filed by the plaintiff’s attorney during the decision period against the decision to dismiss the case for the reasons written in the Decrees:
DECISION
Plaintiff’s attorney; stating that his client insured his license plate vehicle purchased without excise duty due to his disability over 90% with a 10…4 car insurance policy to the defendant company, this vehicle was damaged as a result of a one-sided traffic accident on the highway on 05/09/2015, when the named person who follows his client’s business … was under dispatch and management, the rights to claim and sue for exemption are reserved, the defendant requested that the company’s receivable amounting to TL 2,500.00, including TL 1,500.00 for compensation for material damage caused to the client’s vehicle and TL 1,000.00 for compensation for loss of value caused to the vehicle, together with the advance interest since the accident, be decided to collect.
The defendant’s lawyer argued for the dismissal of the case.
The court decided to dismiss the case based on the claim, defense and collected evidence; the verdict was appealed by the plaintiff’s attorney.
According to the information and documents contained in the file, since there is no procedural and legal direction in discussing and evaluating evidence based on the grounds decided by the court, it was decided unanimously on 19/09/2017 to APPROVE the provision found in accordance with the procedure and the law by rejecting all objections that were not evaluated on the spot by the plaintiff’s attorney and to collect the remaining 2.20 TL approval fee written below from the defendant.